Companion HubPhase 1: Foundations of the Patent System
Chapter 3

Subject-Matter Eligibility: What Can (and Cannot) Be Patented

Navigating Section 3, Alice/Mayo, and EPO Exclusions

Maps the excluded subject-matter landscape - Section 3(d), 3(k) and 3(m) under Indian law, Alice-Mayo under US law, and the EPO technical-character requirement. Includes practical claim-drafting strategies to overcome eligibility rejections.

2 AI prompts

Companion last updated: June 1, 2026

Key Topics

  • Section 3(d) pharmaceutical exclusion (Novartis case)
  • Section 3(k) software & business methods
  • Alice/Mayo framework (US)
  • EPO technical character doctrine
  • Claim drafting strategies for software inventions
AI Prompt Library

Prompts for This Chapter

Tested AI prompts relevant to the topics covered in Chapter 3. Copy and adapt for your work.

Drafting
IN

Section 3 Compliance Checker (India)

Reviews a proposed claim set against Indian Patent Act Section 3 excluded subject matter and flags risks.

IndiaSection 3subject matter eligibilitycompliance
Drafting
US

Alice/Mayo Eligibility Analysis (USPTO)

Analyses claims under the Alice/Mayo framework and the USPTO's 2019 Revised Guidance.

USPTOAliceMayoSection 101